What an Oscar it was. When Avatar swept the golden Globe awards this year, no
one had any doubts that it would do the same at the academy awards. Everyone were surprised that not only did Avatar failed to win the best picture, but James Cameroon, the brains behind the multi million dollar movie also failed to pick up the best director Award. Many were surprised. Well I was not.
Let me be frank. I am not a huge fan of either James Cameron or his latest cinematic rendition. To put it in plain words, I liked Avatar. Like millions of movie buffs around the world, I waited for a ling time to watch this 12 year in the making science fiction. But no movie can ever live up to such huge expectations, and one is always bound for some disappointment. May be if I had watched Avatar with an open mind and zero expectations, I would have joined the millions protesting against the Academy for handing over the coveted prize to “The Hurt Locker”. But mere technical excellence is not good enough for the Academy.
I have a quick question. When was the last time a science fiction movie got nominated for the best picture category? Think of the best science fiction movies of the last two decades. Matrix, Jurassic park….. Any guesses. Well you have to go up to 1982. Yes, it was Steven Spielberg’s ever green epic E.T. Does it mean science fiction movies are not to be given best picture awards? The thing with science fiction movies is that you rarely feel for anything in those movies except for the splendor it has to offer. The year in which E.T got nominated, Gandhi took home the best picture award. Richard Attenborough the director of Gandhi remarked “I was certain that not only would E.T. win, but that it should win. It was inventive, powerful, [and] wonderful. I make more mundane movies”. On watching E.T in a special screening at the White house, President Regan and Nancy Regan were moved to tears. Did you have any such emotions on watching Avatar? There are many who are critical of the Academy for ignoring science fiction movies for the best picture category. All I have to say is that just take a look at which movie took home the best picture Oscar, the year your favorite sci-fi movie was denied a nomination. The Academy made a rare exception in 2003, when it awarded the Lord of the rings with the best picture award, the first fantasy movie to do so in many years. It is not about the genre, although it’s easy to win the best picture if it is not a sci-fi or a fantasy movie. But a sci-fi or fantasy movie must do more than just concentrating on the visual and sound effects. This brings me to my next point, the screen play. One more question for you. When was the last time a movie won the best picture at the Oscars without being nominated for either original or adapted screenplay? Well surprise…. surprise .It’s James Cameroon again and yes it is Titanic. In 1997 Titanic walked away with 11 Oscars (including best picture and director) but failed to get a nomination in the screen play category. Twelve years later, Avatar gets nominated in 9 categories including best picture and director but failed to get the nomination for screen play. There are many who would agree with me that the screen play of Avatar was below expectation. At times it was so forced and cheesy. On the contrary, District 9 another science fiction movie also got nominated for best picture had a gripping screenplay and deservingly picked a nomination for best adapted screenplay. Had Cameroon worked a little bit more on the screen play of avatar, things would have been definitely different.
I am not overly critical on Avatar. I am also not over the moon on “The Hurt Locker” sweeping the Oscars either. My favorite movie this year was definitely “The Inglorious basterds”. But I am very happy that a movie like the hurt locker walked away with the honors this year.
At the end of the day, nobody makes a movie to win at the Oscar’s, especially James Cameroon.
All that James Cameroon wanted to do was to entertain and he did one hell of a job. I am not taking anything away from him. Avatar is a once in a generation movie. But it was definitely not the best picture, this year had to offer. The Hurt locker made just $12.6 million in the U.S, a respectable showing for an independent film without big stars. "The Hurt Locker" is the lowest-grossing best-picture winner in this modern era of detailed box-office bookkeeping. It took in less than one-fourth the haul of 2005 best-picture winner "Crash," itself one of the least commercially successful recipients of the top Oscar. The academy awards puts the spotlight on great movies which otherwise would have lacked the money power to showcase themselves. Avatar is a grand success, with or without the Oscars. But the journey for “The Hurt Locker” had just begun.
Congratulations Kathryn Bigelow. I am so happy to see a woman winning the best director Oscar for the first time. You truly deserve the honors!


No comments:
Post a Comment